Desk 2. For japan cupid hesap silme men, number of tunes analysed is given given that total number and the list of music analysed each private within the supports. For men, number of nest websites equivalent the number of males filed, for women, it means what amount of nests from which we noticed her or him. Male voice services was averaged towards personal peak prior to calculating brand new displayed study. Imply ± SD | Median is given to your amount of pulses for each sound, course, pulse rate and you can prominent volume
Authored on line:
Shape step 3. Numerous pulse musical developed by the corkwing wrasse. Wave-form (top) and involved spectrogram (below). (a) Grunt of an effective territorial male corkwing wrasse. (b) Strong grunt from good territorial male corkwing wrasse. (c) Grunt off a woman corkwing wrasse. Spectrogram setup: 50 dB vibrant variety, Hamming window (raised sine-squared), 0.008 s windows length (male and female grunt), 0.08 s screen length (men strong grunt)
Shape 3. Multiple heartbeat music developed by the new corkwing wrasse. Wave-form (top) and you may relevant spectrogram (below). (a) Grunt off a territorial men corkwing wrasse. (b) Deep grunt regarding an effective territorial men corkwing wrasse. (c) Grunt from a lady corkwing wrasse. Spectrogram settings: 50 dB dynamic diversity, Hamming screen (raised sine-squared), 0.008 s windows size (male and female grunt), 0.08 s window duration (male strong grunt)
Because of the different structure of grunts and deep grunts, we only compared the sound properties statistically, which were the same in both types of grunt, i.e. dominant frequency and duration. The two male grunt types differ significantly from each other in both propertiespared to deep grunts, male grunts are of a shorter duration (t-test: t = 5.44, P < 0.00step 1, CI = ?0.47–1.09). The dominant frequency is higher in male grunts than in male deep grunts (Mann Whitney U test: W = 0, N1 = 17, N2 = 11, P < 0.001). Table 2 presents all measured sound properties for comparison.
Compared to male grunts, female grunts had a significantly lower pulse-rate (t-test: t = -6.71, P < 0.0001, CI = -- -). Grunts of males and females had a similar dominant frequency (t-test: t = 1.38, P = 0.17, CI = -0.05- 0.26), duration (t-test: t = 0.47, P = 0.64, CI = -0.19- 0.26), and number of pulses (Mann Whitney U test: W = 302, N1 = 17, N2 = 35, P = 0.94).
Single-heartbeat sounds
The selection of demonstrably assignable presses triggered the study off 102 male ticks regarding 30 films away from 19 somebody and 66 girls ticks away from 20 movies at nests off fourteen guys. The selection of certainly assignable plops led to the research out of 73 male plops out-of 28 clips regarding 18 films and 66 females plops out-of 21 films within nests regarding 14 males. Averaging men tunes for each and every private male lead to a sample measurements of n = 18 getting ticks, and you can n = 17 to own plops.
Clicks are sharp, single-pulse broadband sounds with their main energy in a frequency range of several hundred Hz, while the sound pressure level difference across the harmonics are small (Figure 4(a), Table 3). The dominant frequency of clicks was significantly higher in males than in females (Mann Whitney U test: W = 409, N1 = 35, N2 = 66, P = 0.04). However, there were some female clicks for which the dominant frequency was much higher than in most clicks (up to 7200 Hz). We did not see any technical reason to exclude these outliers from the analysis. Clicks did not differ between males and females in the sound pressure level difference between dominant frequency and its 5 th harmonic (t-test: t48.cuatro = 0.84, P = 0.40, CI = ?2.17–5.31).